More than a few groups of critics have staged campaign against the extension of the PATRIOT Act. Scheduled in February this year, the voting would be the deciding factor whether the bill would continue to exist. Two-thirds of the House members ought to vote YES so that the H.R. 514 could run for an additional period. This move is seen as fast tracking the method in order to obtain decisive results.
Contentions have been aired questioning the manner the bill would be extended. One point that was raised was that there have been no significant reforms to the old law that would warrant its extension. According to critics, there is no provision for supervision and responsibility. If ever, it is incredibly weak and would not hold water.
Proposals were presented and debates were finished last year. Checks and balances had been among the areas that were debated on. It is said that the new planned version is complete of these provisions. The bill did not meet the deadline for revisions as the debates went especially slow. The initial extension was accepted in February last year. There is an additional proposal to extend it until February of this year. There was also an understanding to resolve the concerns ahead of giving another extension.
Another renewal is about to be proposed as February 2011 starts. This means that there would be no PATRIOT reforms that would transpire. The proposal is to extend the bill’s life until December 8, 2011. However, as what previously occurred, there would nevertheless be no debate. As anticipated, no one could have the opportunity to propose amendments to enhance the bill.
What seems so “scary” with reference to the bill? Well, it is said that innocent citizens might be subjected under surveillance. Section 215 of the bill empowers the government to acquire secret court orders. This can be used to get into private data such as internet, phone and business records.
Foreign intelligence wiretaps could be allowed under this law. Any person possibly will be wiretapped, even those without relationship to any foreign power or terrorist group. Any mobile phone number, email account or other communications facility can be accessed whenever government “feels” there is a need to do so.
Critics say those are the provisions that must not be incorporated in the renewal. Real reforms should be done in order for it to be meaningful. Extra checks and balances ought to be included; weak points ought to be removed. This could be done if debates are permitted. This is the only way to make certain that civil liberties are upheld.
Privacy is not a given. From the Patriot Act to Facebook, your Privacy is not secure. If you are concerned about protecting your privacy, please visit our website on using an Anonymous Proxy to browse the Internet safely and securely. It’s up to you to protect your privacy.